Article 199 from the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other sufficient remedy is provided by regulation." It is actually perfectly-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust obtainable remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether Those people remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
The court emphasized that in cases of intentional murder, the gravity on the offense demands the most stringent punishment, taking into consideration the sanctity of human life and deterrence for possible offenders.
four. It has been noticed by this Court that there is really a delay of in the future while in the registration of FIR which has not been explained from the complainant. Moreover, there is not any eye-witness of the alleged event along with the prosecution is relying on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession from the petitioners has become tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of them namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram took place to become the real brothers of the deceased but they did not respond in the least to your confessional statements with the petitioners and calmly observed them leaving, one particular after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not search much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on 14.02.2018 and there is not any explanation regarding why her arrest wasn't effected after making in the alleged extra judicial confession. It's been held on a great number of situations that extra judicial confession of the accused is often a weak style of evidence which may be manoeuvred through the prosecution in any case where direct connecting evidence does not arrive their way. The prosecution can be relying on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal did not say a word concerning presence of some light with the place, where they allegedly observed the petitioners together with a motorcycle at four.
Section 302 on the Pakistan Penal Code addresses the grave offense of intentional murder and prescribes severe punishments to work as a deterrent and copyright the value of human life. The application on the death penalty or life imprisonment depends around the specifics of each and every case, including any extenuating circumstances or mitigating factors.
The Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) is a comprehensive bit of legislation that defines various criminal offenses and prescribes corresponding punishments for all those found guilty.
The presiding judge emphasized the need to address the evolving techniques used by counterfeiters, noting that the amendment’s inclusion of technological factors allows for any more thorough legal response.
(Interview by email, with Ahmad Rafay Alam, a leading environmental lawyer and activist in Pakistan, August twenty eighth, 2015). Furthermore, the ruling placed a notice and comment restriction on government more info agencies in regards to projects that could potentially pose a public risk. This case can also be noteworthy, “because it laid down the foundations of all long term public interest litigation introduced before courts for environmental protection.” To cite only one example, following this case, the Supreme Court, citing the Zia decision, found while in the Salt Miners Case (decided on 12th July, 1994) that the right to have water free from pollution and contamination is usually a right to life itself.
whether although granting promotion senior employees were regarded as for promotion or otherwise and submit the compliance report.(Promotion)
Pakistani legal citations typically incorporate the year, court, and case number. Familiarizing yourself with this format will help you quickly Track down the cases you need. Many free case legislation websites allow you to definitely search directly using citations.
When the petitioner is actually present with the place of prevalence without causing any injury into the deceased or PWs then in such circumstances, whether He's vicariously liable shall be decided because of the figured out trial Court after recording with the evidence.
The appellate court determined that the trial court experienced not erred in its decision to allow more time for information to generally be gathered because of the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.
Post arrest bail Granted, U/S 302 PPC, charge of conspiracy and ent couldn't be proved Except if case is attempted(Bail Matters)
If the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not experienced a possibility to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC may well allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is usually only carried out if the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. Within the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence along with the petitioner company responded to your allegations as such they were nicely conscious of the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use for being appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 173 Order Date: 04-FEB-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
P.C. for grant of post arrest bail should also be dismissed. Suffice is to look at that that considerations for pre- arrest and post-arrest bail are absolutely different. Reliance in this regard is placed on case law titled as “Shah Nawaz v. The State” 2005 SCMR 1899” wherein it has been held because of the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:--